Get Help

Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Community
- :
- PTC Mathcad
- :
- PTC Mathcad
- :
- The power of 1/3

Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

07-01-2013
11:12 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Notify Moderator

07-01-2013
11:12 AM

The power of 1/3

Look at this picture, and how to explain it? I use MC15 and MC 2001, the same the answer.

Solved! Go to Solution.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

07-02-2013
03:37 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Notify Moderator

07-02-2013
03:37 AM

zhu laojianke wrote:

Is there anyway I can get this answer without using symbolic calculation?

Nothing I could think of. And the symbolics won't help you - I just used it to get all solutions of my equation and show why Mathcad (and most other math programs I know) chose a complex one in case the argument is negative.

I have to change all the power expression to root expresstion to get the whole graph of the function.

That seem very troublesome.

If it would be a built-in function you could write your ownt and overrule Mathcads one, but in case of the exponentiation operator you can't. So any solution would require a rewriting of the expression. But at least in Mathcad with the root symbol you have an alternative which you don't have in many other programs (because its mathematically doubtful but helpful from an practical engineering point of view).

To state it clearly: Mathcad is perfectly right in doing what it does here! (-1)^(1/3) is NOT -1 per definition!

5 REPLIES 5

07-01-2013
04:27 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Notify Moderator

07-01-2013
04:27 PM

a^(1/3) defaults to the solution of x^3=a with the smallest positive argument.

Therefore if a is negative the result is a complex number which can not be plotted

07-01-2013
08:00 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Notify Moderator

07-01-2013
08:00 PM

Is there anyway I can get this answer without using symbolic calculation?

When I plot or calculate a more complex algebraic expression, such as:

I have to change all the power expression to root expresstion to get the whole graph of the function.

That seem very troublesome.

07-02-2013
03:37 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Notify Moderator

07-02-2013
03:37 AM

zhu laojianke wrote:

Is there anyway I can get this answer without using symbolic calculation?

Nothing I could think of. And the symbolics won't help you - I just used it to get all solutions of my equation and show why Mathcad (and most other math programs I know) chose a complex one in case the argument is negative.

I have to change all the power expression to root expresstion to get the whole graph of the function.

That seem very troublesome.

If it would be a built-in function you could write your ownt and overrule Mathcads one, but in case of the exponentiation operator you can't. So any solution would require a rewriting of the expression. But at least in Mathcad with the root symbol you have an alternative which you don't have in many other programs (because its mathematically doubtful but helpful from an practical engineering point of view).

To state it clearly: Mathcad is perfectly right in doing what it does here! (-1)^(1/3) is NOT -1 per definition!

07-02-2013
09:54 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Notify Moderator

07-02-2013
09:54 AM

OK, I'll take care of modifing my expression when I need to research a total graph of a function in the future. It seems that there are lots of difference in logic between computor calculation and mind thinking.

07-02-2013
05:35 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Notify Moderator

07-02-2013
05:35 AM

Without plot: